Cell Phone & Remote Work Expense Reimbursement by State (2026)

Dated source review

Fact Check: Cell Phone & Remote Work Expense Reimbursement by State (2026)

Verified
18
Partial
0
Issue
0
Outdated
0
Unverifiable
0
Verified July 25, 2026How we fact-check

What the review found

Summary

We checked 18 claims in this article against research expense-reimbursement-laws-by-state (and its fact-check), plus companion mileage surfaces for vehicle-satellite links only. All 18 verified. No invented state duties, no SERP "nine mandatory cell-phone states" conflation, no fixed judicial phone-percentage claim, no Aguilar-as-expense citation (the research fact-check omitted Aguilar for lack of a Tier-1 expense holding). Stipend dollar ranges are framed as common practice, not black-letter rates.

Verification result: the checked article claims are verified for publication. The article correctly treats federal law as a kickback floor, concentrates affirmative phone/remote risk in CA/IL with Field Code + NH broad roster, and routes vehicle detail to the mileage cluster.

Statutory / regulatory

1 claim

Statutory survey

2 claims

Statutory

4 claims

Practice pattern / negative claim

1 claim

No court has fixed a universal cell-phone percentage; article does not treat a 30–50% range as black-letter

Appears in
Cell phones
Source (primary)
Research: Expense reimbursement laws by state
Source (secondary)
research fact-check Partial on stipend/percentage practice ranges
Verified
July 25, 2026
Notes

Conscious non-assertion of a fixed percentage matches research fact-check handling.

Docket / settlement fact

1 claim

Tax statute

1 claim

Regulatory

1 claim

Tax / survey boundary

1 claim

Sources

14 unique sources cited across the report — click to audit any claim directly against its evidence.

  1. 01Research: Expense reimbursement laws by state
  2. 02https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/29/531.35
  3. 03https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=2802.&lawCode=LAB
  4. 04https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/ca-court-of-appeal/1675681.html
  5. 05research fact-check Partial on stipend/percentage practice ranges
  6. 06https://law.justia.com/cases/california/court-of-appeal/2023/a165390.html
  7. 07https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63186857/williams-v-amazoncom-services-llc/
  8. 08https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/ca-supreme-court/1179515.html
  9. 09https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/67
  10. 10https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/206
  11. 11https://www.ilga.gov/documents/legislation/ilcs/documents/082001150k9.5.htm
  12. 12https://www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/massachusetts/454-CMR-27-04
  13. 13https://law.justia.com/cases/california/court-of-appeal/2019/c086672.html
  14. 14Research: Mileage reimbursement requirements by state

Check our work

Every claim above links to the source we used. Open any source to compare the wording here with the underlying rule, guidance, court opinion, or product behavior.

If a source has changed or a claim looks wrong, tell us. We would rather correct the page than leave a stale answer online. See how we fact-check.

About Clockspot

We make employee time clock software for small businesses.

About Clockspot

Clockspot keeps clock-ins, corrections, approvals, and payroll-ready hours connected so owners and managers can review the workweek before payroll.

Want to simplify how your team tracks time? See how Clockspot works.