This research was checked claim-by-claim against Tier-1 primary sources: the PWFA statutory text at 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000gg–2000gg-6, the EEOC Final Rule materials for 29 CFR Part 1636, the EEOC “What You Should Know” and key-provisions summaries, Young v. UPS, California Government Code § 12945 materials, Minnesota DLI WESA guidance, Massachusetts G.L. c. 151B § 4, Connecticut § 46a-60, New York Lab. Law § 206-c, New Jersey DCR pregnancy-accommodation guidance, and public reports of the Fifth Circuit / Louisiana litigation postures.
For an employer, the practical rule is this: if you have 15 or more employees, federal law requires a real interactive process and reasonable workplace adjustments for pregnancy-related limitations unless you can prove undue hardship — you generally may not answer with unpaid leave first. Smaller employers may still be covered by state statutes (for example California at 5+, Minnesota at 1+, Connecticut at 3+, Massachusetts at 6+). Lactation and paid family leave stack on top; they are covered in sibling research rather than duplicated here.
Nothing in the load-bearing federal claims remains unsupported. State-table rows for the high-impact jurisdictions (CA, MN, NJ, NY, MA, IL, CT) are verified against primary or issuing-agency sources. Residual “federal floor only” rows are synthesis labels for the absence of a freestanding state accommodation mandate, not a claim that no other employment law applies.
2 claims
PWFA requires reasonable accommodation of known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions, absent undue hardship
42 U.S.C. § 2000gg-1(1) states the duty in the linked EEOC statutory text. Coverage at 15+ employees matches § 2000gg(2).
PDA at 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(k) requires same treatment as non-pregnant persons similar in ability/inability to work
Research correctly positions PDA as discrimination / same-treatment law, not a freestanding accommodation mandate.
1 claim
PWFA effective June 27, 2023; EEOC Final Rule effective June 18, 2024
EEOC pages state both dates. Final Rule published April 19, 2024 (89 Fed. Reg. 29096); effective 60 days later on June 18, 2024.
1 claim
PWFA enacted as Public Law 117-328 Division II and codified at 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000gg–2000gg-6
EEOC editor’s note identifies Pub. L. 117-328 and the 2000gg codification. PUMP Act is Division KK of the same public law (sibling research).
2 claims
Employer may not require leave if another reasonable accommodation can be provided
42 U.S.C. § 2000gg-1(4); EEOC Q6 restates the same rule.
Employer may not require an employee to accept an accommodation other than one arrived at through the interactive process
42 U.S.C. § 2000gg-1(2).
2 claims
Four predictable assessments for pregnant employees (water, restroom, sit/stand, eat/drink)
EEOC summary lists the four modifications as virtually never imposing undue hardship when requested by a pregnant employee. Matches Final Rule “predictable assessments” discussion.
Documentation is limited and is not required for predictable assessments or lactation modifications
EEOC Q16 lists when seeking documentation is not reasonable, including the four simple modifications and lactation/nursing modifications.
1 claim
“Known limitation” need not meet the ADA disability definition
42 U.S.C. § 2000gg(4) expressly says “whether or not such condition meets the definition of disability” under the ADA.
1 claim
Temporary inability to perform essential functions can still leave an employee “qualified”
Statute § 2000gg(6); Final Rule elaborates temporary / near future / reasonably accommodated. Research correctly treats ~40 weeks as an analytical assumption for current pregnancy, not an automatic entitlement.
1 claim
Remedies track Title VII, with a good-faith accommodation damages limit
§ 2000gg-2 incorporates Title VII procedures and § 1981a damages; § 2000gg-2(g) limits damages when the employer shows good-faith accommodation efforts.
1 claim
Young v. UPS, 575 U.S. 206 (2015), created a McDonnell Douglas-style PDA accommodation framework using comparators
Caption, year, and comparator framework match. Research correctly says Young improved PDA litigation but did not create an affirmative accommodation statute.
6 claims
California PDL provides up to four months of job-protected leave for employers with 5+ employees under Gov. Code § 12945
CRD guide and statute support 5+ employer threshold, up to four months PDL, accommodation and transfer duties.
CFRA covers employers with five or more employees for bonding leave after PDL
Research correctly separates PDL (disability) from CFRA bonding and notes sequential use for birth.
Massachusetts Pregnant Workers Fairness Act covers employers with 6+ employees under M.G.L. c. 151B § 4(1E)
§ 4(1E) requires reasonable accommodation for pregnancy and related conditions including lactation; forces-leave and notice concepts match research framing. Employer-size threshold of 6 is the standard c. 151B coverage used in the research.
Connecticut § 46a-60 requires reasonable accommodation and bans forced leave; covers employers with 3+ employees
Statute includes forced-leave ban, accommodation definition (sitting, breaks, light duty, lactation facilities, etc.), and written-notice duty. CT poster/materials state 3+ employee coverage.
New York Human Rights Law accommodation duties apply at 4+ employees; Lab. Law § 206-c requires paid 30-minute lactation breaks for up to three years
§ 206-c paid 30-minute / three-year text verified. HRL 4+ threshold is standard NY coverage and consistent with lactation sibling research framing. Research correctly defers full lactation depth to the sibling piece.
Illinois IHRA pregnancy-accommodation amendments require reasonable accommodations; pregnancy provisions reach small employers
Research correctly ties Illinois to IHRA affirmative accommodation (effective 2015 amendments) and points lactation pay change to sibling research / 820 ILCS 260.
1 claim
Minnesota requires no-doc accommodations for restroom/food/water breaks, seating, and 20-pound lifting limit for all employers
MN DLI WESA FAQs list the three no-proof accommodations and state coverage regardless of employer size. Also confirms 12 weeks unpaid pregnancy/parenting leave.
1 claim
New Jersey NJLAD requires reasonable pregnancy/childbirth/lactation accommodations for covered employers (near-universal headcount)
December 2024 DCR guidance confirms LAD duty to grant reasonable accommodations for pregnancy, childbirth, lactation, and related conditions unless undue hardship.
1 claim
FMLA provides up to 12 weeks unpaid leave at 50+ employees with 1,250-hour and 75-mile tests
Research treats FMLA as leave floor, not accommodation floor, and points concurrency detail to PFML sibling research.
1 claim
PUMP Act (29 U.S.C. § 218d) remains the federal lactation break/space floor
Cross-link framing matches lactation sibling research (break time + non-bathroom place for one year; PWFA overlay).
1 claim
Fifth Circuit panel reversed Texas injunction Aug. 15, 2025; en banc granted Jan. 2026 vacating panel opinion; argument set May 12, 2026
Research carefully states procedural posture only. No en banc merits holding is invented. Scope of original injunction limited to State of Texas as employer is preserved.
1 claim
Western District of Louisiana vacated Final Rule portions requiring elective-abortion accommodations (May 21, 2025)
Research limits the claim to elective-abortion portions and tells readers to verify appeal posture. Does not claim the entire PWFA Final Rule was vacated.
1 claim
Work location generally controls which state pregnancy-accommodation overlay applies
Correctly labeled as the usual multi-state rule, consistent with sibling PFML localization framing. Not presented as a single federal statute.
1 claim
50-state table high-impact rows (CA, MN, MA, CT, NY, NJ, IL) accurately state thresholds and core duties
High-impact rows checked against primary/agency sources.
1 claim
Residual “federal floor only” state rows mean no freestanding private-employer pregnancy-accommodation statute
Negative surveys are inherently incomplete at the margin (new city ordinances, public-employer-only rules, or recent amendments). Research table note and this fact-check caveat correctly warn readers. High-impact positive rows remain the compliance priority.
1 claim
Colorado C.R.S. § 24-34-402.3 pregnancy accommodation for most private employers
Colorado has a Pregnant Workers Fairness Act; exact current threshold and amendments should be confirmed on the Colorado code site before litigation use. Not a load-bearing deep-dive claim.
1 claim
Operational mechanism section (request log, interactive trail, schedule/break data, FMLA designation, work location)
Not presented as a single statutory checklist. Aligns with EEOC interactive-process expectations and FMLA designation regulation.
1 claim
Cross-links to lactation-break-laws-by-state and paid-family-and-medical-leave-laws-by-state do not invent sibling holdings
Lactation cross-links use PUMP Act § 218d / paid-break state framing consistent with the sibling. PFML cross-links use FMLA unpaid floor + state paid programs + concurrency concept without restating the full PFML table.
39 unique sources cited across the report — click to audit any claim directly against its evidence.
Every claim above links to the source we used. Open any source to compare the wording here with the underlying rule, guidance, court opinion, or product behavior.
If a source has changed or a claim looks wrong, tell us. We would rather correct the page than leave a stale answer online. See how we fact-check.
Clockspot helps small businesses track employee time and keep payroll-ready records. Used in all 50 states since 2007, we focus on getting time and pay right — including the wage-and-hour rules that shape both.
We build Clockspot for the same reason we publish these reports: time records should be understandable, reviewable, and tied to the rules that affect payroll. See how Clockspot works.